Though it should not surprise anyone, there exist
significant distinctions between the O’Odham who live in the United States and
those who live in Mexico. These differences stem mainly from the length and
intensity of interactions between the O’Odham and the Spanish Viceroyalty of
New Spain (later the sovereign state of Mexico). The O’Odham to the north of
the border retain many of the qualities Hispanic scholars observed in
indigenous tribes during the process of Iberian assimilation, mainly a
significant population outside of the Catholic Church, a relatively rudimentary
infrastructure, and a wholesale lack of an Iberian upper class. While those in
the South have been assimilated to a much greater degree. These differences present an interesting case study for
anthropologist but presents real issues for the tribe itself.
With the
more complete assimilation in the south, the tribe has become noticeably weaker
there. This leads to a poor allocation of resources to these people along with
the loss of significant cultural traditions specific to these areas. This will
continue to pose an issue until such a point that there is some normalization
of the governmental status of tribal members both north and south of the border. As such it is imperative that the tribe leverage its newfound legal strength to mount cases to secure the rights of tribal members in the south such that the tribe will be able to provide adequate care for all its members regardless of their citizenship.
No comments:
Post a Comment