Throughout the
week, we continually confronted the concepts of fragmentation and continuity
among the O’odham. These concepts were
usually discussed in terms of generational gaps or developing loss or maintenance
of direct cultural ties. A particularly
significant source of fragmentation is language, as I addressed in an earlier
blog post, but other areas that could contribute include location of birth and
current residence (which tie into language), occupation, family, urban and
suburban development, technological advancement. The list goes on and on, as with any group of
people, as we exist simultaneously within communities and as individuals. We navigate this balance in our ambitions
throughout life. With ever-increasing
opportunity, those ambitions can become far greater, thus enabling greater
possibilities for distance. The
relationship between individuality and community constantly changes, and the
navigation of such a relationship and its changes exists both individually and
communally.
Most of the speakers this week
touched on this navigation in some sense, whether historically or in the
context of the present situation. What
it means to be O’odham and what it means to be a member of the O’odham
community comes to be defined and redefined individually and
generationally. Any changes in this
identity on an individual or group level can be particularly terrifying for
others within the identity, as they may feel that their particular community is
collapsing around them if suddenly it does not mirror the same practices and
beliefs. These fears and worries become apparent
when community members encourage the repetition of the same patterns of life,
the replication of old customs, behaviors, and beliefs, in order to maintain
the life of the community among present and future generations. This tension between change and replication
has existed universally throughout time as a critical element of culture. It is a matter of not just culture in the
static but culture in fluid practice as well.
Nevertheless, even though this type
of navigation is inherent to the communal human experience, it does not make it
any easier. The O’odham have passed
through periods that tested their own definition of their identity, through the
separation in beliefs regarding the homes of creator I’itoi or through the
imperialist influence of the Spanish conquistadors or of Father Kino. These influences had impacts on the O’odham
identity in multifaceted ways, both enforcing and solidifying their beliefs and
practices and introducing new elements. Current
influences should theoretically have similar impacts; however, it is important
to note that identity definition and redefinition are not merely passive
acts. The actions by the O’odham
individuals that we met with this week, in which they actively pass down and
reactivate cultural elements such as language, customs, practices, and beliefs,
represent aspects of natural and continued identity definition and redefinition
in the navigation of the balances between individual and community, tradition
and change, fragmentation and continuity.